Microsoft Flight Simulator X ADDONS: Aerosim - 787 Tropicalsim - Guarulhos 2015 Paulo Ricardo - Mega Sao Paulo FTX - Global/Vector FTX - Trees HD FSDreamteam. Does anyone know if a fix or an add-on BGL file is available to get AI to follow the River Visual into KDCA for the Tropical Sim. Foto badan kecil payudara besar montok. I don't have the scenery in question but I have a lot from both developers. I feel that LatinVFR products are better than Tropicalsim overall. Both are great companies and both provide great service.In my opinion Tropical Sim's sceneries are a little like ImagineSim's work, except that Tropical Sim has great customer service and a forum. The thing with TS is that the FSX products seem to still look like FS9 products as far as the texture work is concerned. Frankly, these days I think for pure looks and texture work, FSDT, FlyTampa, FlightBeam, ORBX, and some Aerosoft products are the tops in terms of looks, while ImagineSim and Tropical Sim are putting out FSX products that look like FS8 or FS9 quality.I agree though that LatinVFR products look better than Tropical Sim, although I am not overly impressed with the blend job they did with the watermasking in the photoreal part of Key West. In fact, I think the Key West product is probably not their best work compared to their other products. Overall, I find that LatinVFR products look a lot b ether than TropicalSim products. The latter tend to look a bit bland. Often there is very nice 3D detail present, but it's textured in a way that makes it look 'boring' for lack of a better word. Here's where LatinVFR tends to be strong: they tend to have very good texturing. LatinVFR's problem can be very big, however. Jar of hearts by christina perri. LatinVFR tends to have very inaccurate building placement, and many of their objects themselves resemble their real world counterparts only rather marginally. When you start looking closer and look at actual photographs of the real thing, you start noticing god knows how many errors in LatinVFR's sceneries. As a matter of fact, after doing lots of LatinVFR reviews, I simply stopped doing them because I was fed up of saying time on time again that the same sort of errors are found everywhere. However, Ricardo is a terribly nice guy for as far as I have seen, and working with him was always pleasant. Key West, his latest airport, is far more accurate in some departments, although I still question the accuracy of the buildings themselves. Even with all these faults of LatinVFR, I would probably still choose them over TropicalSim, simply because the texturing of LatinVFR is better. By the way, I also quite like LatinVFR's prizes. If I had to only recommend one airport, it would be an easy answer, Latin VFR's KEYW. It's their best work to date. IMHONot me, I think their Key West stinks compared to thier SBGR. I just hate the way they did the water blend masks since you can still see squares in the water where the photoreal ends, plus the night textures are way to bright imho. Aside from that I think Key West is ok, but surprisingly since I have had it a few months now, I haven't even done a flight in or out of it, lol. Just one of those airports I bought on an impulse and ended up not liking very much. [.] Aside from that I think Key West is ok, but surprisingly since I have had it a few months now, I haven't even done a flight in or out of it, lol. Just one of those airports I bought on an impulse and ended up not liking very much. Same here, but I have it with most of my airports. I have many airports, and relatively limited time, so many airports go unused. I have yet to fly in or out of FlyTampa's Midway, even though I have it for a long time now. Yesterday I did my first flight into KSFO in FSX (and was surpassed by the terrible performance.).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |